Open AccessImproving survival disparities in cervical cancer between Māori and non‐Māori women in New Zealand: a national retrospective cohort study
Author(s) -
McLeod Melissa,
Harris Ricci,
Purdie Gordon,
Cormack Donna,
Robson Bridget,
Sykes Peter,
Crengle Sue,
Iupati Douglas,
Walker Nick
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.946
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1753-6405
pISSN - 1326-0200
DOI - 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00506.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cervical cancer , retrospective cohort study , hazard ratio , pacific islanders , demography , cohort , incidence (geometry) , cancer , gynecology , cohort study , obstetrics , confidence interval , population , environmental health , physics , sociology , optics
Objective:Māori women in New Zealand have higher incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer than non‐Māori women, however limited research has examined differences in treatment and survival between these groups. This study aims to determine if ethnic disparities in treatment and survival exist among a cohort of Māori and non‐Māori women with cervical cancer.Methods:A retrospective cohort study of 1911 women (344 Māori and 1567 non‐Māori) identified from the New Zealand Cancer Register with cervical cancer (adenocarcinoma, adenosquamous or squamous cell carcinoma) between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2006.Results:Māori women with cervical cancer had a higher receipt of total hysterectomies, and similar receipt of radical hysterectomies and brachytherapy as primary treatment, compared to non‐Māori women (age and stage adjusted). Over the cohort period, Māori women had poorer cancer specific survival than non‐Māori women (mortality hazard ratio (HR) 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.63–2.62). From 1996 to 2005, the survival for Māori improved significantly relative to non‐Māori.Conclusion:Māori continue to have higher incidence and mortality than non‐Māori from cervical cancer although disparities are improving. Survival disparities are also improving. Treatment (as measured) by ethnicity is similar.Implications:Primary prevention and early detection remain key interventions for addressing Māori needs and reducing inequalities in cervical cancer in New Zealand.