Open AccessMeasuring psychological, social, and environmental influences on leisure‐time physical activity among adults
Author(s) -
Burton Nicola W.,
Oldenburg Brian,
Sallis James F.,
Turrell Gavin
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of public health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.946
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1753-6405
pISSN - 1326-0200
DOI - 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00008.x
Subject(s) - cronbach's alpha , psychology , reliability (semiconductor) , population , sample (material) , test (biology) , applied psychology , clinical psychology , psychometrics , medicine , environmental health , paleontology , power (physics) , chemistry , physics , chromatography , quantum mechanics , biology
Many of the self‐administered scales for measuring physical activity (PA) influences were originally developed for vigorous‐intensity exercise, focus on only one domain of influence, and have not been evaluated for both reliability and validity using population‐based samples. Objective: This study describes the factorial validity and internal reliability of scales for measuring individual‐level psychological, social, and environmental influences on leisure‐time PA among adults in the general population. Method: Constructs were identified from a literature review and formative research with a socio‐economically diverse sample. Items were generated using previously developed scales and interview data. New items were pre‐tested using reliability and principal components analyses, with data collected from a mail survey sent to a randomly selected population‐based sample. Qualitative feedback was obtained from a convenience sample and expert panel. A second mail survey provided data for principal components and reliability analyses. Results: Twenty‐eight scales were factorially derived and 24 had acceptable or marginally acceptable levels of internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.65 to 0.91. Conclusions and Implications: The 24 scales are suitable for researchers and practitioners interested in measuring individual‐level influences on PA that are consistent with Social Cognitive Theory. More research is required to assess predictive validity, sensitivity to change and test/re‐test reliability.