Open AccessR eal O ptions in flood risk management decision making
Author(s) -
Woodward M.,
Gouldby B.,
Kapelan Z.,
Khu S.T.,
Townend I.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of flood risk management
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.049
H-Index - 36
ISSN - 1753-318X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1753-318x.2011.01119.x
Subject(s) - flood myth , flood risk management , investment (military) , climate change , risk analysis (engineering) , socioeconomic status , environmental resource management , risk management , psychological intervention , intervention (counseling) , flexibility (engineering) , environmental science , environmental planning , business , environmental economics , computer science , geography , economics , finance , population , political science , ecology , environmental health , psychology , archaeology , psychiatry , politics , law , biology , medicine , management
Effective flood risk management involves the quantification of flood risk and the implementation of cost‐effective, sustainable, and environmentally and socially acceptable measures that reduce flood risk. However, making decisions on the most appropriate long‐term intervention investments can be challenging; this is primarily because of the uncertainties associated with future climate change and socioeconomic development. R eal O ptions analysis is a widely recognised approach for encouraging appropriate climate change adaptation and mitigation investment decisions. To date, however, there has only been limited use of R eal O ptions A nalysis T echniques within the F lood and C oastal E rosion R isk M anagement community. In this paper, a methodology is described that has the capability to assess the most appropriate set of interventions to make in a flood system, given the future uncertainties. The methodology captures the concepts of R eal O ptions and has the capability to value the flexibility associated with potential flood risk management intervention options across a range of future climate change and socioeconomic scenarios. The novel R eal O ptions approach has been tested and verified on a real‐life case study situated in the Thamesmead area of the T hames E stuary. The results obtained demonstrate the potential for substantial cost savings under future uncertainties when R eal O ptions are used instead of more traditional, precautionary approaches.