z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Cost‐effectiveness of clean air administered to the breathing zone in allergic asthma
Author(s) -
Brodtkorb ThorHenrik,
Zetterström Olle,
Tinghög Gustav
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
the clinical respiratory journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.789
H-Index - 33
eISSN - 1752-699X
pISSN - 1752-6981
DOI - 10.1111/j.1752-699x.2009.00156.x
Subject(s) - medicine , asthma , allergic asthma , breathing , anesthesia , intensive care medicine
  Airsonett Airshower (AA) is a novel non‐pharmaceutical treatment for patients with perennial allergic asthma that uses a laminar airflow directed to the breathing zone of patients during sleep. It has been shown that AA treatment in addition to optimized standard therapy significantly increases asthma‐related quality of life among adolescent asthmatics. However, the cost‐effectiveness of AA treatment has not yet been assessed. As reimbursement decisions are increasingly guided by results from the cost‐effectiveness analysis, such information is valuable for health‐care policy‐makers. Objective:  The objective of this study was to estimate the cost‐effectiveness of adding AA treatment with allergen‐free air during night sleep to optimized standard therapy for adolescents with perennial allergic asthma compared with placebo. Materials and Methods:  A probabilistic Markov model was developed to estimate costs and health outcomes over a 5‐year period. Costs and effects are presented from a Swedish health‐care perspective (QALYs). The main outcome of interest was cost per QALY gained. Results:  The Airshower strategy resulted in a mean gain of 0.25 QALYs per patient, thus yielding a cost per QALY gained of under €35 000 as long as the cost of Airshower is below €8200. Conclusions:  Adding AA treatment to optimized standard therapy for adolescents with perennial allergic asthma compared with placebo is generating additional QALYs at a reasonable cost. However, further studies taking more detailed resource use and events such as exacerbations into account would be needed to fully evaluate the cost‐effectiveness of AA treatment. Please cite this paper as: Brodtkorb T‐H, Zetterström O and Tinghög G. Cost‐effectiveness of clean air administered to the breathing zone in allergic asthma. The Clinical Respiratory Journal 2010; 4: 104–110.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here