Open AccessConservation prioritization in widespread species: the use of genetic and morphological data to assess population distinctiveness in rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) from British Columbia, Canada
Author(s) -
Taylor Eric B.,
Tamkee Patrick,
Keeley Ernest R.,
Parkinson Eric A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
evolutionary applications
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.776
H-Index - 68
ISSN - 1752-4571
DOI - 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2010.00136.x
Subject(s) - biology , rainbow trout , intraspecific competition , genetic variation , ecology , biodiversity , microsatellite , optimal distinctiveness theory , population , conservation genetics , threatened species , trout , species richness , zoology , habitat , demography , fishery , allele , genetics , psychology , sociology , fish <actinopterygii> , psychotherapist , gene
Prioritization of efforts to maintain biodiversity is an important component of conservation, but is more often applied to ecosystems or species than within species. We assessed distinctiveness among 27 populations of rainbow trout (Salmonidae: Oncorhynchus mykiss ) from British Columbia, Canada, using microsatellite DNA variation (representing historical or contemporary demography) and morphology (representing adaptive variation). Standardized genetic scores, that is, the average deviation across individuals within populations from the overall genetic score generated by factorial correspondence analysis, ranged from 1.05 to 4.90 among populations. Similar standardized morphological scores, generated by principal components analysis, ranged from 1.19 to 5.35. There was little correlation between genetic and morphological distinctiveness across populations, although one population was genetically and morphologically the most distinctive. There was, however, a significant correlation ( r = 0.26, P = 0.008) between microsatellite ( F ST ) and morphological ( P ST ) divergence. We combined measures of allelic richness, genetic variation within, and divergence among, populations and morphological variation to provide a conservation ranking of populations. Our approach can be combined with other measures of biodiversity value (habitat, rarity, human uses, threat status) to rationalize the prioritization of populations, especially for widespread species where geographic isolation across distinct environments promotes intraspecific variability.