Premium
Comparison of Macroinvertebrate‐Derived Stream Quality Metrics Between Snag and Riffle Habitats 1
Author(s) -
Stepenuck Kristine F.,
Crunkilton Ronald L.,
Bozek Michael A.,
Wang Lizhu
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
jawra journal of the american water resources association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.957
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1752-1688
pISSN - 1093-474X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00197.x
Subject(s) - riffle , snag , habitat , ecology , benthic zone , cobble , riparian zone , streams , environmental science , water quality , invertebrate , biomonitoring , hydrology (agriculture) , biology , geology , computer network , geotechnical engineering , computer science
We compared benthic macroinvertebrate assemblage structure at snag and riffle habitats in 43 Wisconsin streams across a range of watershed urbanization using a variety of stream quality metrics. Discriminant analysis indicated that dominant taxa at riffles and snags differed; Hydropsychid caddisflies ( Hydropsyche betteni and Cheumatopsyche spp.) and elmid beetles ( Optioservus spp. and Stenemlis spp.) typified riffles, whereas isopods ( Asellus intermedius ) and amphipods ( Hyalella azteca and Gammarus pseudolimnaeus ) predominated in snags. Analysis of covariance indicated that samples from snag and riffle habitats differed significantly in their response to the urbanization gradient for the Hilsenhoff biotic index (BI), Shannon’s diversity index, and percent of filterers, shredders, and pollution intolerant Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) at each stream site ( p ≤ 0.10). These differences suggest that although macroinvertebrate assemblages present in either habitat type are sensitive to detecting the effects of urbanization, metrics derived from different habitats should not be intermixed when assessing stream quality through biomonitoring. This can be a limitation to resource managers who wish to compare water quality among streams where the same habitat type is not available at all stream locations, or where a specific habitat type (i.e., a riffle) is required to determine a metric value (i.e., BI). To account for differences in stream quality at sites lacking riffle habitat, snag‐derived metric values can be adjusted based on those obtained from riffles that have been exposed to the same level of urbanization. Comparison of nonlinear regression equations that related stream quality metric values from the two habitat types to percent watershed urbanization indicated that snag habitats had on average 30.2 fewer percent EPT individuals, a lower diversity index value than riffles, and a BI value of 0.29 greater than riffles.