Premium
History and Development of the NRCS Lag Time Equation 1
Author(s) -
Folmar Norman D.,
Miller Arthur C.,
Woodward Donald E.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
jawra journal of the american water resources association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.957
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1752-1688
pISSN - 1093-474X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2007.00066.x
Subject(s) - hydrograph , flood myth , hydrology (agriculture) , surface runoff , watershed , return period , environmental science , hec hms , snowmelt , hydrological modelling , unit (ring theory) , meteorology , computer science , geology , geography , climatology , archaeology , mathematics , geotechnical engineering , ecology , mathematics education , machine learning , biology
Many of the hydrologic methods that are used in engineering practice today resulted from the Spring Flood of 1936, which blanketed the Northeastern portion of the United States. Because of the flood damage that was caused by this rainfall‐snowmelt event, many federal agencies including the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers and the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) implemented the hydrologic theories that were available in the literature at this time and developed hydrologic procedures for design flow estimation. Sherman had recently published his unit hydrograph theory in 1932, and later in 1938 Snyder, who had been charged by the Water Resource Council to develop a synthetic unit hydrograph, published his famous paper. The SCS unit hydrograph theory was developed by Victor Mockus in the late 1950s. Most if not all of the theories at that time reported the rainfall‐runoff process for floods as a surface phenomenon, and as such those theories all required some type of a timing parameter to estimate watershed response time. This article documents the development of the SCS lag equation.