Premium
ADEQUACY OF SELECTED EVAPOTRANSPIRATION APPROXIMATIONS FOR HYDROLOGIC SIMULATION 1
Author(s) -
Sumner David M.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
jawra journal of the american water resources association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.957
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1752-1688
pISSN - 1093-474X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2006.tb04486.x
Subject(s) - evapotranspiration , groundwater recharge , surface runoff , environmental science , precipitation , hydrological modelling , eddy covariance , hydrology (agriculture) , infiltration (hvac) , vegetation (pathology) , atmospheric sciences , meteorology , climatology , geology , geography , ecosystem , groundwater , aquifer , medicine , ecology , geotechnical engineering , pathology , biology
Evapotranspiration (ET) approximations, usually based on computed potential ET (PET) and diverse PET‐to‐ET conceptualizations, are routinely used in hydrologic analyses. This study presents an approach to incorporate measured (actual) ET data, increasingly available using micrometeorological methods, to define the adequacy of ET approximations for hydrologic simulation. The approach is demonstrated at a site where eddy correlation‐measured ET values were available. A baseline hydrologic model incorporating measured ET values was used to evaluate the sensitivity of simulated water levels, subsurface recharge, and surface runoff to error in four ET approximations. An annually invariant pattern of mean monthly vegetation coefficients was shown to be most effective, despite the substantial year‐to‐year variation in measured vegetation coefficients. The temporal variability of available water (precipitation minus ET) at the humid, subtropical site was largely controlled by the relatively high temporal variability of precipitation, benefiting the effectiveness of coarse ET approximations, a result that is likely to prevail at other humid sites.