Premium
DETERMINING MINIMUM FLOWS AND LEVELS: THE FLORIDA EXPERIENCE 1
Author(s) -
Munson Adam B.,
Delfino Joseph J.,
Leeper Douglas A.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
jawra journal of the american water resources association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.957
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1752-1688
pISSN - 1093-474X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03712.x
Subject(s) - legislation , legislature , water supply , water resources , population , resource (disambiguation) , environmental planning , natural resource , odds , business , environmental resource management , water resource management , natural resource economics , environmental science , environmental protection , geography , environmental engineering , economics , law , political science , ecology , medicine , computer network , logistic regression , demography , archaeology , sociology , computer science , biology
Florida water resources are among the most abundant in the United States, with Florida receiving the second‐highest mean annual rainfall of all states. However, water supply issues have troubled the state due to the highly variable spatial and temporal distributions of water supply and demand, and they are aggravated by the population's preference for settling in coastal regions where freshwater resources are scarce. Historically, the competing issues of water resource development and natural systems protection have placed water management agencies and local governments at odds. In 1997, the Florida Legislature enacted several major changes to Florida water law in an attempt to improve water resource planning and protection. This paper briefly reviews the history of water management in Florida with an emphasis on decisions culminating in the 1997 legislation, which requires the development of minimum flows and levels. Also examined is the impact of the 1997 law on water management. Efforts made to comply with legislative mandates are summarized; these include, to date, establishment of minimum flows and levels on 209 water bodies and budgeting in excess of $1.4 billion for water resource development projects.