Premium
A NONTRADITIONAL METHODOLOGY FOR FLOOD STAGE‐DAMAGE CALCULATIONS 1
Author(s) -
Das Sujit,
Lee Russell
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
jawra journal of the american water resources association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.957
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1752-1688
pISSN - 1093-474X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1988.tb03046.x
Subject(s) - flood myth , damages , hydrology (agriculture) , digital elevation model , land use , floodplain , environmental science , 100 year flood , census , routing (electronic design automation) , elevation (ballistics) , computer science , geography , cartography , civil engineering , geology , remote sensing , mathematics , population , engineering , geotechnical engineering , computer network , archaeology , demography , geometry , sociology , political science , law
This paper presents a new methodology to calculate economic losses from hypothetical, extreme flood events, such as the Probable Maximum Flood. The methodology uses economic data compiled from already‐available secondary sources, such as U.S. Census data on magnetic tapes, utilizing microcomputer and other electronic media. Estimates of land elevations are obtained from topographic maps, and flood elevations axe estimated using, for example, a dam breach and flood routing (DAMBRK) model (Fread, 1984). The calculations are performed at a disaggregate spatial scale, by various land use and industrial classification categories. The basic areal units are city blocks (for urbanized areas), enumeration districts, and Census tracts. Depth‐damage functions, which provide an estimate of damages as a proportion of the existing value of the structure, are estimated statistically. Computer software (called DAMAGE) is used to combine the economic, flood elevation, and depth‐damage information to compute economic losses for different possible flood stages and for different inflow events. Two case studies are presented as illustrations of the method.