z-logo
Premium
PEAK PERIOD DESIGN STANDARDS FOR SMALL WESTERN U.S. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS 1
Author(s) -
Hughes Trevor C.
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
jawra journal of the american water resources association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.957
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1752-1688
pISSN - 1093-474X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1980.tb02446.x
Subject(s) - environmental science , ditch , water supply , irrigation , per capita , investment (military) , peak demand , hydrology (agriculture) , water storage , water resources , index (typography) , pipeline transport , water resource management , meteorology , environmental engineering , geography , engineering , computer science , population , law , ecology , sociology , world wide web , biology , political science , inlet , mechanical engineering , electricity , demography , geotechnical engineering , politics , electrical engineering
In order to determine design capacities for various components of municipal and rural domestic water supply systems, engineers must estimate water requirements for an entire year (water rights), for the peak season (reservoir storage), for the peak day (pump or treatment plant size), and for peak hour (pipeline sizes). Historically, per capita water use rates have varied greatly between systems, particularly in semiarid regions where outdoor demands are large. The resulting uncertainty in design capacity estimates can cause either inadequate capacities or premature investment. In order to minimize that uncertainty multiple regression and frequency analyses were made of the various water demand parameters mentioned above for 14 systems in Utah and Colorado. Specifically, demand functions are reported for average month, peak month, and peak day. Peak hour demands were also studied but are reported in a different paper. The independent variables which were significant for monthly and daily demands were price of water and an outdoor use index which includes the effect of variation in landscaped area and accounts for use of supplementary ditch or pressure irrigation systems. The demand functions were developed with data from systems varying in size from very small low density rural systems to Salt Lake City's water system. The correlation coefficients (R 2 ) vary from 0.80 to 0.95.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here