Premium
FEDERAL SUBSIDY OF IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT 1
Author(s) -
Wyckoff J. B.
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
jawra journal of the american water resources association
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.957
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1752-1688
pISSN - 1093-474X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1980.tb02396.x
Subject(s) - subsidy , land reclamation , irrigation , enforcement , agricultural economics , acre , arid , business , federal budget , federal law , public land , natural resource economics , law , economics , finance , political science , environmental science , legislation , geography , agroforestry , archaeology , ecology , paleontology , fiscal year , biology
The Congress of the United States has been concerned about public lands from the earliest days of this republic. The importance of irrigation on these public lands was explicitly noted with enactment of the Carey Act of 1884. This was reinforced with the passage in 1902 of “An Act appropriating the receipts from the sale and disposal of public lands in certain states and territories to the construction of irrigation works for the reclamation of arid lands.” This Act further specified that land so irrigated would be entered under the provisions of the Homestead Laws and developed in units of not less than 40 nor more than 160 acres. The enforcement of the 160 acre limitation has been reinforced by several recent lawsuits. These have reaffirmed the provisions of the Reclamation Law requiring owners receiving water from Federal projects to sell land in excess of 160 acres. While there have been Federal subsidies involved in the development of irrigation in the western states, the total amount of the subsidies are insignificant compared to the total Federal budget and the size of subsidies under other Federal programs. Thus, the real question in enforcing the 160 acre limitation may well be one of land reform rather than the distribution of Federal subsidies.