Premium
CONSTRUCTIVE HYPOTHESIZING, DIALOGIC UNDERSTANDING AND THE THERAPIST'S INNER CONVERSATION: SOME IDEAS ABOUT KNOWING AND NOT KNOWING IN THE FAMILY THERAPY SESSION
Author(s) -
Rober Peter
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of marital and family therapy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.868
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1752-0606
pISSN - 0194-472X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2002.tb00371.x
Subject(s) - dialogic , constructive , conversation , active listening , psychology , session (web analytics) , psychotherapist , process (computing) , epistemology , pedagogy , computer science , communication , philosophy , world wide web , operating system
The primary tasks of the therapist can be described as listening to what the client says and making space for what the client has not yet said. According to Anderson and Goolishian, the therapist should take a not‐knowing stance in this dialogic process. The question remains, however, what not‐knowing exactly means. In this article, I will explore this question and I will propose the concept of constructive hypothesizing. Constructive hypothesizing is described as a process in which there is a movement back and forth between knowing and not knowing. Of central importance are creative and dialogic understanding, rather than knowledge. Recommendations are made to ensure the constructive and collaborative use of hypotheses in the therapeutic dialogue.