Premium
Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Bias on Isotope Ratios in Dolomite–Ankerite, Part II : δ 13 C Matrix Effects
Author(s) -
Śliwiński Maciej G.,
Kitajima Kouki,
Kozdon Reinhard,
Spicuzza Michael J.,
Fournelle John H.,
Denny Adam,
Valley John W.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
geostandards and geoanalytical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.037
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1751-908X
pISSN - 1639-4488
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2015.00380.x
Subject(s) - analytical chemistry (journal) , ankerite , chemistry , dolomite , isotope , carbonate , repeatability , matrix (chemical analysis) , secondary ion mass spectrometry , ion , mineralogy , mass spectrometry , calcite , physics , chromatography , siderite , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
This study is Part II of a series that documents the development of a suite of calibration reference materials for in situ SIMS analysis of stable isotope ratios in Ca‐Mg‐Fe carbonates. Part I explored the effects of Fe 2+ substitution on SIMS δ 18 O bias measured from the dolomite–ankerite solid solution series [CaMg( CO 3 ) 2 –CaFe( CO 3 ) 2 ], whereas this complementary work explores the compositional dependence of SIMS δ 13 C bias (calibrated range: Fe# = 0.004–0.789, where Fe# = molar Fe/(Mg+Fe)). Under routine operating conditions for carbonate δ 13 C analysis at Wisc SIMS ( CAMECA IMS 1280), the magnitude of instrumental bias increased exponentially by 2.5–5.5‰ (session‐specific) with increasing Fe‐content in the dolomite structure, but appeared insensitive to minor Mn substitution [< 2.6 mole % Mn/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Mn)]. The compositional dependence of bias (i.e., the matrix effect) was expressed using the Hill equation, yielding calibration residual values ≤ 0.3‰ relative to CRM NBS ‐19 for eleven carbonate reference materials (6‐μm‐diameter spot size measurements). Based on the spot‐to‐spot repeatability of a drift monitor material that ‘bracketed’ each set of ten sample‐spot analyses, the analytical precision was ± 0.6–1.2‰ ( 2s , standard deviations). The analytical uncertainty for individual sample analyses was approximated by combining the precision and calibration residual values (propagated in quadrature), suggesting an uncertainty of ± 1.0–1.5‰ (2 s ).