z-logo
Premium
Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry Bias on Isotope Ratios in Dolomite–Ankerite, Part II : δ 13 C Matrix Effects
Author(s) -
Śliwiński Maciej G.,
Kitajima Kouki,
Kozdon Reinhard,
Spicuzza Michael J.,
Fournelle John H.,
Denny Adam,
Valley John W.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
geostandards and geoanalytical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.037
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1751-908X
pISSN - 1639-4488
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2015.00380.x
Subject(s) - analytical chemistry (journal) , ankerite , chemistry , dolomite , isotope , carbonate , repeatability , matrix (chemical analysis) , secondary ion mass spectrometry , ion , mineralogy , mass spectrometry , calcite , physics , chromatography , siderite , organic chemistry , quantum mechanics
This study is Part II of a series that documents the development of a suite of calibration reference materials for in situ SIMS analysis of stable isotope ratios in Ca‐Mg‐Fe carbonates. Part I explored the effects of Fe 2+ substitution on SIMS δ 18 O bias measured from the dolomite–ankerite solid solution series [CaMg( CO 3 ) 2 –CaFe( CO 3 ) 2 ], whereas this complementary work explores the compositional dependence of SIMS δ 13 C bias (calibrated range: Fe# = 0.004–0.789, where Fe# = molar Fe/(Mg+Fe)). Under routine operating conditions for carbonate δ 13 C analysis at Wisc SIMS ( CAMECA IMS 1280), the magnitude of instrumental bias increased exponentially by 2.5–5.5‰ (session‐specific) with increasing Fe‐content in the dolomite structure, but appeared insensitive to minor Mn substitution [< 2.6 mole % Mn/(Ca+Mg+Fe+Mn)]. The compositional dependence of bias (i.e., the matrix effect) was expressed using the Hill equation, yielding calibration residual values ≤ 0.3‰ relative to CRM NBS ‐19 for eleven carbonate reference materials (6‐μm‐diameter spot size measurements). Based on the spot‐to‐spot repeatability of a drift monitor material that ‘bracketed’ each set of ten sample‐spot analyses, the analytical precision was ± 0.6–1.2‰ ( 2s , standard deviations). The analytical uncertainty for individual sample analyses was approximated by combining the precision and calibration residual values (propagated in quadrature), suggesting an uncertainty of ± 1.0–1.5‰ (2 s ).

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom