Premium
Preliminary Characterisation of New Glass Reference Materials (GSA‐1G, GSC‐1G, GSD‐1G and GSE‐1G) by Laser Ablation‐Inductively Coupled Plasma‐Mass Spectrometry Using 193 nm, 213 nm and 266 nm Wavelengths
Author(s) -
Guillong Marcel,
Hametner Kathrin,
Reusser Eric,
Wilson Stephen A.,
Günther Detlef
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
geostandards and geoanalytical research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.037
H-Index - 73
eISSN - 1751-908X
pISSN - 1639-4488
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2005.tb00903.x
Subject(s) - laser , materials science , calibration , laser ablation , analytical chemistry (journal) , electron microprobe , ablation , wavelength , excimer laser , certified reference materials , optics , chemistry , optoelectronics , detection limit , chromatography , physics , statistics , mathematics , engineering , metallurgy , aerospace engineering
New glass reference materials GSA‐1G, GSC‐1G, GSD‐1G and GSE‐1G have been characterised using a prototype solid state laser ablation system capable of producing wavelengths of 193 nm, 213 nm and 266 nm. This system allowed comparison of the effects of different laser wavelengths under nearly identical ablation and ICP operating conditions. The wavelengths 213 nm and 266 nm were also used at higher energy densities to evaluate the influence of energy density on quantitative analysis. In addition, the glass reference materials were analysed using commercially available 266 nm Nd:YAG and 193 nm ArF excimer lasers. Laser ablation analysis was carried out using both single spot and scanning mode ablation. Using laser ablation ICP‐MS, concentrations of fifty‐eight elements were determined with external calibration to the NIST SRM 610 glass reference material. Instead of applying the more common internal standardisation procedure, the total concentration of all element oxide concentrations was normalised to 100%. Major element concentrations were compared with those determined by electron microprobe. In addition to NIST SRM 610 for external calibration, USGS BCR‐2G was used as a more closely matrix‐matched reference material in order to compare the effect of matrix‐matched and non matrix‐matched calibration on quantitative analysis. The results show that the various laser wavelengths and energy densities applied produced similar results, with the exception of scanning mode ablation at 266 nm without matrix‐matched calibration where deviations up to 60% from the average were found. However, results acquired using a scanning mode with a matrix‐matched calibration agreed with results obtained by spot analysis. The increased abundance of large particles produced when using a scanning ablation mode with NIST SRM 610, is responsible for elemental fractionation effects caused by incomplete vaporisation of large particles in the ICP.