Premium
Major and Trace Element Analysis of Silicate Rocks by XRF and Laser Ablation ICP‐MS Using Lithium Borate Fused Glasses: Matrix Effects, Instrument Response and Results for International Reference Materials
Author(s) -
Yu Zongshou,
Norman Marc D.,
Robinson Philip
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
geostandards newsletter
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1751-908X
pISSN - 0150-5505
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-908x.2003.tb00713.x
Subject(s) - analytical chemistry (journal) , trace element , silicate , lithium borate , matrix (chemical analysis) , inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry , laser ablation , mineralogy , chemistry , boron , materials science , mass spectrometry , borate glass , laser , metallurgy , optics , chromatography , physics , organic chemistry
Major and trace element compositions of fifteen silicate rock reference materials have been determined by a combined XRF and laser ablation ICP‐MS (LA‐ICP‐MS) technique on glasses prepared by fusing the sample with a lithium borate flux (sample:flux = 1:3). Advantages of this technique include the ability to measure major and trace element abundances on a single sample using a quick and simple preparation that attacks resistant phases such as zircon without the need for acid dissolution. The method is suitable for a wide variety of bulk compositions including mafic, intermediate and silicic rocks. Abundance‐normalized mass response patterns (the ratio of signal intensity to element concentration) of the LA‐ICP‐MS analyses vary systematically with major element composition, demonstrating the presence of a matrix effect that cannot be compensated by normalisation to a single internal standard element. Increasing the sampling distance between the ICP‐MS cone and the torch reduces the magnitude of this effect, suggesting that a mechanism related to residence time of ablated particles in the plasma may be at least partially responsible for the observed variations in mass response patterns. When using a matrix‐matched calibration, agreement of the LA‐ICP‐MS results with published reference values or those obtained by solution ICP‐MS is 10% relative. Analytical precision based on replicate analyses is typically 5% RSD. Procedural detection limits that include contributions from gas background and flux are 0.01‐0.1 μg g‐ 1 for the heavy mass trace elements (Rb‐U). Major element analyses by XRF show excellent agreement with results obtained using a conventional heavy element absorbing flux. High quality major and trace element data for silicate rocks can be achieved by a combined XRF and LA‐ICP‐MS analysis of Li 2 B 4 O 7 /LiBO 2 fused glasses provided an appropriate matrix‐matched calibration is adopted.