z-logo
Premium
Anti‐polymorphonuclear neutrophil antibodies in patients with leukopenia or neutropenia
Author(s) -
RIERA N. E.,
ROSSO SALTÓ M.,
GALÁN V.,
CANALEJO K.,
KHOURY M.,
AIXALÁ M.,
KANTOR G. L.,
VERMEULEN M.,
BENGIÓ R.,
DE BRACCO M. M. E.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
international journal of laboratory hematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.705
H-Index - 55
eISSN - 1751-553X
pISSN - 1751-5521
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-553x.2009.01173.x
Subject(s) - antibody , cd16 , granulocyte , leukopenia , neutropenia , immunology , immune system , flow cytometry , medicine , immunofluorescence , tumor necrosis factor alpha , chemotherapy , cd3 , cd8
Summary Introduction:  Immune humoral neutropenia (Np) could be the consequence of anti‐polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) antibodies, circulating immune complexes (CIC) and/or antibodies against myeloid precursors. Granulocyte immunofluorescence test (GIFT) and a leukoagglutination technique (LAGT) assays are recommended for its diagnosis. Methods:  Fifty adult patients with secondary Np were screened for anti‐PMN. GIFT by flow cytometry from viable PMN and LAGT were employed. In addition, CIC levels, low expression of CD16 b (CD16 b low ), PMN phenotype and sera tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) were also evaluated. Results:  Direct IgG‐PMN binding (dir‐GIFT) was positive in 16% of the patients. Antibodies against autologous PMN were detected in 32% of the samples by indirect (ind)‐GIFT and demonstrated in 70% of the sera by both ind‐GIFT and/or LAGT. Predominance of human neutrophil alloantigen (HNA)‐1b and HNA‐2 expression was confirmed. CD16 b low was detected in 16% of the patient’s PMN and TNF‐α in 68% of sera patients. Conclusion:  Our results suggest that diagnosis of immune Np in the laboratory may be improved by focusing on patient’s PMN together with the assessment of cellular markers.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here