Premium
The Historical, Jurisprudential, and Empirical Wisdom of Parental Responsibility Laws
Author(s) -
Brank Eve M.,
Scott Leroy
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
social issues and policy review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.798
H-Index - 35
eISSN - 1751-2409
pISSN - 1751-2395
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2011.01034.x
Subject(s) - blame , juvenile delinquency , retributive justice , economic justice , statute , juvenile , empirical research , law , criminology , psychology , sociology , political science , social psychology , epistemology , biology , philosophy , genetics
The parent‐child relationship is woven deep within historical and contemporary culture, but strong retributive ideals have led to blaming parents because of their presumed vicarious role in juvenile crime. The current article will discuss the history, forms, legal challenges, and empirical research related to parental involvement laws in the United States. The parent‐child relationship provides the historical framework behind the separate juvenile justice parens patriae system; however, with the juvenile justice system not as successful as originally imagined, blame has shifted to the parents. We examine the potential constitutional implications of enacting and enforcing parental involvement statutes and ordinances and also the potential efficacy of parental involvement laws in reducing juvenile delinquency. In addition, we propose empirical research to test the underlying assumptions about blame made by parental involvement laws.