Premium
HETEROGENEITY OF THE QUINONE ELECTRON ACCEPTOR SYSTEM IN BACTERIAL REACTION CENTERS
Author(s) -
Baciou Laura,
Sebban Pierre
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
photochemistry and photobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.818
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1751-1097
pISSN - 0031-8655
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1995.tb05269.x
Subject(s) - quinone , chemistry , electron acceptor , photosynthetic reaction centre , mutant , recombination , stereochemistry , acceptor , electron transfer , crystallography , photochemistry , biochemistry , physics , gene , condensed matter physics
— In reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas viridis , biphasicity of the charge recombination kinetics between P + , the primary electron donor, and Q A and Q B ‐ , the primary and secondary quinone electron acceptors, respectively, have been analyzed by the flash‐induced absorption change technique. We have studied the effect of quinone environment modifications on the ratio of the two phases for the P + Q A ‐ ([A fast /A slow ] a ) and P + Q B ‐ ([A fast /A slow ] b ) charge recombination processes. In reaction centers from Rps. viridis reconstituted in phosphatidylcholine liposomes a notable influence of the nature of the Q B pocket occupancy was observed on (A fast /A slow ) a . This ratio is much affected by the presence of o ‐phenanthroline compared to reaction centers with an empty Q B pocket or with terbutryn present. Because o‐phenanthroline was proposed to hydrogen bind His L190 , whereas terbutryn does not, we suggest that a His LI90 ‐Fe‐His M217 (the equivalent to His LI90 in the Q A pocket) “wire” may be involved in the existence of the two conformational states associated with the two phases of charge recombination. In chromat‐ophores from the T 1 (Ser L223 → Ala; Arg L217 → His) and T 4 (Tyr L222 → Phe) mutants no modification of the (A fast /A slow ) a ratio is detected, whereas the (A fast /A slow ) b ratios are substantially modified compared to the wild type (WT). In the T 3 mutant (Phe L216 → Ser; Val M263 → Phe [4.1 Å apart from Q A ]), (A fast /A slow ) a is notably changed compared to the WT. Our data show that any modification in the close protein environment of the quinones and/or of the His L190 and His M217 affects the equilibrium between the two reaction center states. This is consistent with the existence of two reaction center states from Rps. viridis , associated with two different conformations of the quinones‐histidines‐iron system. This “wire” allows both quinone protein pockets to interact over quite long distances.