Premium
A COMPARISON OF MAMMALIAN CELL SENSITIVITY TO EITHER 254 nm OR ARTIFICIAL “SOLAR” SIMULATED RADIATION
Author(s) -
Gill Randall F.,
Coohill Thomas P.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
photochemistry and photobiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.818
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1751-1097
pISSN - 0031-8655
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-1097.1987.tb05374.x
Subject(s) - xeroderma pigmentosum , strain (injury) , sunlight , cell , cell culture , biology , radiation , fibroblast , radiation sensitivity , irradiation , biophysics , microbiology and biotechnology , chemistry , biochemistry , optics , genetics , anatomy , dna , dna repair , physics , nuclear physics
The sensitivity of six mammalian cell strains to either germicidal (254 nm) or artificial “solar” simulated radiation was tested. The solar simulator used had an output similar, in some respects, to natural sunlight. Cellular capacity for Herpes simplex virus production was used as the assay procedure. The tested cells were a strain of African green monkey kidney cells and five human skin fibroblast cell strains. The latter included a “normal” cell strain, and four photosensitive cell strains; three of which were strains of xeroderma pigmentosum cells, and one strain of Bloom's syndrome cells. When comparing the D 10 values, the different cell strains varied by a factor of six in response to germicidal radiation, but only by a factor of two to artificial “solar” simulated radiation. The relative sensitivity of the cells to either type of radiation also varied from 1.7 to 10.9. Large variations in response occurred even among the xeroderma pigmentosum cell strains. These responses suggest that mammalian cell sensitivity to 254 nm radiation may not be a true indicator of a cell's responses to natural sunlight.