Premium
Specificity of absorbed ELISA and agar gel immuno‐diffusion tests for paratuberculosis in goats with observations about use of these tests in infected goats
Author(s) -
WHITTINGTON RJ,
EAMENS GJ,
COUSINS DV
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
australian veterinary journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.382
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1751-0813
pISSN - 0005-0423
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-0813.2003.tb11437.x
Subject(s) - paratuberculosis , serology , veterinary medicine , mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis , biology , virology , antibody , medicine , immunology , mycobacterium , genetics , bacteria
Objective To determine the specificity of serological tests that are currently used in veterinary diagnostic laboratories in Australia for detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp para‐tuberculosis infection in goats. Design A laboratory study. Procedure Four tests were studied, comprising AGID with M a paratuberculosis antigen derived from cattle isolates of caprine or bovine origin, the EMAI caprine Johne's disease absorbed ELISA and the CSL PARACHEK Johne's absorbed EIA. The specificities of AGID and ELISA for paratuberculosis (Johne's disease) were estimated after examining a panel of 1000 serum samples collected from goats in Western Australia, a region free of paratuberculosis. In addition a comparison was made of test performance in a small number of paratuberculous goats from New South Wales using sera from two archival collections. Results The specificity of the AGID tests was 100% while the specificities of the two absorbed ELISA were 99.7 to 99.8% at appropriate positive‐negative cut‐offs. Based on testing the small sample of sera from infected goats, the absorbed ELISA tests detected about twice as many goats with Johne's disease as the AGID. Each test detected para‐tuberculous animals regardless of whether infection was caused by cattle or sheep strains of M a paratuberculosis . Conclusions Both ELISA and AGID tests for paratubercu‐losis have high specificity and can be used in a market assurance program without risk of generating large proportions of false positive test results. However, the results suggested the ELISA is more sensitive for detection of infected goats and should be used in preference to the AGID. The two formats of ELISA evaluated in this study have similar characteristics and could be used in paratuberculosis control programs for the goat industries, but further data on sensitivity would increase confidence in their application.