Premium
Prevalence of megabacteria in budgerigar colonies
Author(s) -
FILIPPICH LJ,
HENDRIKZ JK
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
australian veterinary journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.382
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1751-0813
pISSN - 0005-0423
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1998.tb14533.x
Subject(s) - budgerigar , culling , feces , biology , population , veterinary medicine , offspring , melopsittacus , zoology , medicine , ecology , environmental health , pregnancy , herd , genetics
Objective To measure the prevalence of megabacteria in budgerigar‐breeding colonies and to evaluate possible methods to reduce the prevalence. Design A monitoring study over several years. Sample population Two budgerigar ( Melopsittacus undulatus ) colonies with over 300 birds each. Procedure The prevalence of megabacteria in the faeces in two budgerigar breeding colonies, colony 1 and 2, was determined by faecal examination of each bird. Following an initial survey (1990), most of the birds that were scored 2+ or more were culled and a management practice was implemented to discriminate against positive birds. Consecutive yearly surveys (1991, 1992) were conducted on the young birds bred in these colonies. The prevalence of megabacteria in colony 2 was also evaluated in 1994 and 1996 after all the birds were treated with amphotericin B administered in drinking water. Results The prevalence of megabacteria in the two colonies was significantly (P < 0.001) different. Overall the prevalence of megabacteria adjusted for colony differences was significantly higher (P < 0.025) in males compared to females. Age was not an influencing factor. After the initial survey, the prevalence in the offspring did not significantly (P > 0.05) decrease in the following two annual breeding seasons but by inference it did significantly decrease after amphotericin B treatment. Conclusion The practice of culling most birds with more megabacteria in faeces and discriminating against positive birds when selecting birds for breeding or culling birds on show quality does not decrease megabacteria prevalence in the offspring. However, a reduction in prevalence does occur with administration of amphotericin B. Birds may have amphotericin B‐resistant organisms and these birds need to be identified and culled.