Premium
Evaluation of dressings to aid healing of mulesing wounds on sheep
Author(s) -
LEVOT GW.,
HUGHES PB.,
KALDOR CJ.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
australian veterinary journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.382
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1751-0813
pISSN - 0005-0423
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1989.tb09732.x
Subject(s) - wound healing , wound dressing , medicine , surgery , organophosphate , dentistry , materials science , biology , pesticide , agronomy , composite material
Five proprietary and one experimental dressing were compared with no treatment in their ability to aid healing of mulesing wounds in over 1900 young lambs. Healing was judged as the completeness of shrinkage of the mulesing cuts and the condition of scabs on the new skin surface. When assessed at 21 d it was found that treatment with Heriots Crown Wound Powder® or Coopers Mulesing Powder® offered a significant advantage over leaving the wounds untreated. Neither aqueous organophosphate washes, Defiance® nor Defiance® containing 0.08% chlorfenvinphos offered any healing advantage over controls. However, washing the wounds with an aqueous organophosphate solution aided healing more than the Defiance®‐based dressings. It was considered that the powders or the washes encouraged quick scab formation either by creating a dry covering (powders) or by washing away blood and allowing fast drying of the wound. The Defiance®‐type dressings slowed healing by keeping the wound moist for up to 10 d, but healing was not significantly different to the untreated group by 21 d.