Premium
A comparison of nematode control programs for cattle in south western Victoria
Author(s) -
RIFFKIN G. G.,
CALLINAN A. P. L.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
australian veterinary journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.382
H-Index - 59
eISSN - 1751-0813
pISSN - 0005-0423
DOI - 10.1111/j.1751-0813.1987.tb09675.x
Subject(s) - nematode , biology , veterinary medicine , geography , ecology , medicine
Nematodiasis and its subsequent effect on production in Hereford weaner steers in western Victoria was studied during 1983 and 1984. In the first summer, steers were allocated to 2 replicates of 6 treatments – No treatment (Nil); Morantel slow release bolus in March (M1); Morantel bolus in March and June (M2); pour‐on levamizole in January, May and July (R3); albendazole in January and July (V2) and albendazole in January, May and July, (V3). In 1984, treatment M2 was discontinued to provide extra replicates for Nil and M1. The replicate paddocks were 5 ha and were stocked with 7 and 8 steers in 1983 and 1984, respectively. Nematode egg counts in faeces, were generally<50 epg, indicating low numbers of adult nematodes. Faecal egg counts were highest in autumn and declined during the year. There was a significant (P = 0.02) effect of treatment on mean faecal egg count. Mean egg counts for treatment groups Nil and M1 were 16 and 10 epg above the overall mean (47 epg); those of the other treatments were 6 to 12 epg below the mean. There were no significant (P = 0.8) differences between treatments in the numbers of nematode larvae on pasture, during the experiment. At the end of both years of the experiment most nematodes (92%) were early fourth stage larvae of O. ostertagi. There were no consistent differences in nematode counts between treatments. There were no significant (P = 0.33) differences between treatments in bodyweights at any time during the experiment. After adjustment for herbage availability and year, steers in the V2 group had heaviest final liveweights; they were 19 kg heavier than the Nil group and 8 kg heavier than the V3 group. We conclude that cattle producers may not derive an economic benefit from treating weaner cattle with these anthelmintics.