Premium
Equivocal Colonic Carcinogenicity of Aloe arborescens Miller var. natalensis Berger at High‐Dose Level in a Wistar Hannover Rat 2‐y Study
Author(s) -
Yokohira M.,
Matsuda Y.,
Suzuki S.,
Hosokawa K.,
Yamakawa K.,
Hashimoto N.,
Saoo K.,
Nabae K.,
Doi Y.,
Kuno T.,
Imaida K.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
journal of food science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 150
eISSN - 1750-3841
pISSN - 0022-1147
DOI - 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2009.01070.x
Subject(s) - traditional medicine , miller , biology , medicine , ecology
A 2‐y carcinogenicity study of Aloe, Aloe arborescens Miller var. natalensis Berger, a food additive, was conducted for assessment of toxicity and carcinogenic potential in the diet at doses of 4% or 0.8% in groups of male and female Wistar Hannover rats. Both sexes receiving 4% showed diarrhea, with loss of body weight gain. The survival rate in the 4% female group was significantly increased compared with control females after 2 y. Hematological and biochemical examination showed increase of RBC, Hb, and Alb in the 4% males. The cause of these increases could conceivably have been dehydration through diarrhea. AST and Na were significantly decreased in the males receiving 4%, and Cl was significantly decreased in both 4% and 0.8% males. A/G was significantly increased in the 4% females, and Cl was significantly decreased (0.8%) in the female group. Histopathologically, both sexes receiving 4% showed severe sinus dilatation of ileocecal lymph nodes, and yellowish pigmentation of ileocecal lymph nodes and renal tubules. Adenomas or adenocarcinomas in the cecum, colon, and rectum were observed in 4% males but not in the 0.8% and control male groups. Similarly, in females, adenomas in the colon were also observed in the 4% but not 0.8% and control groups. In conclusion, Aloe, used as a food additive, exerted equivocal carcinogenic potential at 4% high‐dose level on colon in the 2‐y carcinogenicity study in rats. Aloe is not carcinogenic at nontoxic‐dose levels and that carcinogenic potential in at 4% high‐dose level on colon is probably due to irritation of the intestinal tract by diarrhea.