
Transmissibility of the 1918 pandemic influenza in Montreal and Winnipeg of Canada
Author(s) -
Zhang Shenghai,
Yan Ping,
Winchester Brian,
Wang Jun
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
influenza and other respiratory viruses
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.743
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1750-2659
pISSN - 1750-2640
DOI - 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2009.00117.x
Subject(s) - pandemic , transmissibility (structural dynamics) , preparedness , outbreak , public health , pandemic influenza , epidemiology , influenza pandemic , basic reproduction number , human mortality from h5n1 , environmental health , transmission (telecommunications) , influenza a virus , geography , demography , medicine , covid-19 , virology , political science , population , virus , disease , sociology , infectious disease (medical specialty) , law , pathology , engineering , quantum mechanics , vibration , physics , nursing , vibration isolation , electrical engineering
Background The threat of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) is still causing widespread public concern. A comprehensive understanding of the epidemiology of 1918 pandemic influenza commonly referred to as the Spanish flu may be helpful in offering insight into control strategies for the new pandemic. Objective We explore how the preparedness for a pandemic at the community and individual level impacts the spread of the virus by comparing the transmissibility of the 1918 Spanish flu in two Canadian cities: Montreal and Winnipeg, bearing in mind that each pandemic is unique and the current one may not follow the pattern of the 1918 outbreak. Methods The historical epidemiological data obtained for Montreal and Winnipeg in Canada is analyzed to estimate the basic reproduction number which is the most important summary measure of transmission potential of the pandemic. Results The transmissibility of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus in Winnipeg in the fall of 1918 was found to be much lower than in Montreal based on the estimated reproduction number obtained assuming different serial intervals which are the time between onsets of symptoms in an index case and a secondary case. Conclusion The early preparedness and public health control measures could suggest an explanation for the fact that the number of secondary cases generated by a primary case was significantly reduced in Winnipeg comparing to it in Montreal.