Open AccessAssessment of Demand Feeder Spacing on Hatchery Performance, Fin Condition, and Size Variation of Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss
Author(s) -
Wagner Eric J.,
Routledge M. Douglas,
Intelmann Steven S.
Publication year - 1996
Publication title -
journal of the world aquaculture society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.655
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1749-7345
pISSN - 0893-8849
DOI - 10.1111/j.1749-7345.1996.tb00604.x
Subject(s) - rainbow trout , raceway , biology , zoology , fishery , hatchery , fin , fish measurement , juvenile , coefficient of variation , hematocrit , fish <actinopterygii> , condition index , ecology , statistics , mathematics , endocrinology , physics , materials science , finite element method , composite material , thermodynamics
.— Fingerling rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss , were fed for 133 d by one of three feeding methods: one demand feeder per 5.5 m of raceway, 2 demand feeders per 5.5 m of raceway, and hand‐fed controls. Mean weight, total length, mortality, and feed conversion were not influenced by the method of feeding. Size variation did not differ among treatment groups, as assessed by comparing the coefficient of variation of total length. Necropsy‐based health and condition profiles were conducted three times during the rearing period, and results indicated that fish were generally normal and healthy in all treatments. Several parameters differed significantly over time, but no trends were observed except for the fin index and hematocrit. Over time, hematocrit decreased from 48.6 to 45.0%, and the fin index increased from 0.80 to 1.57. Fin index values did not differ among the feeding methods. Fin condition assessed by measuring relative fin length was better in the single feeder treatment than controls for caudal and ventral fins in the last sample. However, since fish from the two‐feeder treatment did not differ from controls, demand feeding per se did not improve fin condition relative to fish that were fed by hand, four to six times per day. The lack of significant improvements in growth or health with the addition of another demand feeder indicated that using more than one feeder per 5.5 m of raceway length is unnecessary for culture of juvenile rainbow trout.