Premium
Ten warning signs of primary immunodeficiency: a new paradigm is needed for the 21st century
Author(s) -
Arkwright Peter D.,
Gennery Andrew R.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
annals of the new york academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.712
H-Index - 248
eISSN - 1749-6632
pISSN - 0077-8923
DOI - 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06206.x
Subject(s) - primary immunodeficiency , warning signs , medicine , immunodeficiency , intensive care medicine , warning system , primary care , human immunodeficiency virus (hiv) , immunology , disease , family medicine , pathology , computer science , engineering , telecommunications , immune system , transport engineering
The 10 warning signs of primary immunodeficiency are being promoted as a screening tool for use by both the general public and physicians. A recent study, however, shows that except for family history, need for intravenous antibiotics and failure to thrive, the 10 warning signs are not a useful screen of primary immunodeficiency diseases (PIDs). Over the last few decades, there has been a revolution in our understanding of PID. The 10 warning signs do not take into account the fact that PIDs now include diseases that present with sporadic infections, autoimmunity, autoinflammation, and malignancy. This review focuses on the advances in our understanding of PID, the current limitations of the 10 warning signs, and recommendations to ensure that patients with PID are diagnosed in a timely fashion in the future.