Neuroprotection Trek—The Next Generation

A bstract : Animal trials of many pharmacological neuroprotective agents have been quite successful, whereas trials in humans have been uniformly disappointing. A major difference between laboratory research in animals and clinical research in humans is the amount and/or quality of data obtained. The goal of this presentation is to argue that when clinical studies consist of more valid, objective data—that is, as our measurement capabilities in clinical research become as robust as they are in laboratory research—we are likely to gain new insights into both (1) injury to the nervous system and (2) neuroprotective treatment strategies. Technological advances (in data acquisition and analysis)—often novel even in the laboratory—will be the “scale” that will enable progress in measurement. As examples of such technological advances, two projects initiated at NASA Ames Research Center are cited. The NASA Smart Probe Project, with the goal of combining multiple microsensors and neural networks for real‐time tissue identification (e.g., for tumor detection), has recently moved into the clinical realm, with a prototype being used to diagnose breast cancer in women “on the spot”. The NASA Nanoelectrode Array Project has fabricated nanoscale devices that can simultaneously monitor electrical activity and neurotransmitter concentrations, while providing electrical stimulation focally and precisely (and potentially in a closed‐loop fashion based on the input from the nanosensors). The large amounts of data that such techniques can acquire and analyze—separated spatially and temporally throughout the nervous system, if necessary—will provide insights not only into neuroprotective strategies, but also into the workings of the nervous system itself.