Premium
Emerging Morbillivirus Infections of Marine Mammals
Author(s) -
SALIKI JEREMIAH T.,
COOPER EMILY J.,
GUSTAVSON JONATHAN P.
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
annals of the new york academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.712
H-Index - 248
eISSN - 1749-6632
pISSN - 0077-8923
DOI - 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04350.x
Subject(s) - morbillivirus , porpoise , biology , virology , canine distemper , paramyxoviridae , serology , virus , marine mammal , mononegavirales , viral disease , antibody , genetics , ecology , harbour , computer science , programming language
A bstract : In the last 13 years, four viruses belonging in the Morbillivirus genus of the Paramyxoviridae family have emerged as significant causes of disease and mortality in marine mammals. The viruses involved are canine distemper virus (CDV) in seals and polar bears, dolphin morbillivirus (DMV) and porpoise morbillivirus (PMV) in cetaceans, and phocine distemper virus (PDV) in pinnipeds. The two cetacean morbilliviruses (DMV and PMV) are now considered to be the same viral species, named cetacean morbillivirus (CMV). All three morbillivirus species (CDV, CMV, and PDV) are genetically and antigenically related and cross‐react in various serological tests. The diagnosis of morbilliviral infections in marine mammal specimens poses two challenges. First, various marine mammal species can be infected by more than one closely related but distinct morbilliviruses, making definitive virus identification unattainable by classical virology methods. Second, standard immunological reagents such as anti‐species conjugates are unavailable for most marine mammal species, rendering definitive serological diagnosis difficult by classical serological techniques. The objectives of this study were to develop two diagnostic approaches that alleviate these difficulties, providing simple, rapid, and cost‐effective diagnostic methods. For nucleic acid detection, reverse transcription‐polymerase chain reaction (RT‐PCR) and restriction endonuclease digestions were used to differentiate the three viruses. For antibody detection, a monoclonal antibody‐based competitive enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (c‐ELISA) was used on sera from several species, thus avoiding the need for multiple anti‐species enzyme conjugates.