Premium
The Safety of Chorionic Villus Sampling A Synthesis of the Literature
Author(s) -
PHILIP JOHN,
SMIDTJENSEN STEEN,
HILDEN JØRGEN
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
annals of the new york academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.712
H-Index - 248
eISSN - 1749-6632
pISSN - 0077-8923
DOI - 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1991.tb37948.x
Subject(s) - chorionic villus sampling , amniocentesis , obstetrics , chorionic villi , weighting , medicine , fetus , pregnancy , biology , prenatal diagnosis , radiology , genetics
Altogether 10 reports on the safety of chorionic villus sampling, either by the transcervical (TC) or the transabdominal (TA) approach, were reviewed and combined with our own data. After discussion of how unintended fetal loss rates are best estimated, the excess total fetal loss after TC and TA compared with amniocentesis were estimated to be 1.70% (+/- 0.65%) and practically zero (+/- 1.0%), respectively (standard errors in parentheses). The absolute risk of unintended loss after TC is +2.7% (+/- 0.7%) and after TA 1.0% (+/- 1.0%). These estimates are still too uncertain to allow precise weighting of benefits and human costs. A uniform style of reporting studies in this area is proposed.