Premium
New Intrathecal Drugs in Alzheimer's Disease and Psychometric Testing
Author(s) -
WILSON ROBERT S.,
MARTIN EILEEN M.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
annals of the new york academy of sciences
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.712
H-Index - 248
eISSN - 1749-6632
pISSN - 0077-8923
DOI - 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb31825.x
Subject(s) - neurochemical , medicine , clinical trial , dementia , alzheimer's disease , neuroscience , disease , psychology
Bethanechol chloride, a muscarinic agonist, was administered intrathecally to a sample of AD patients in double-blind crossover and open escalating-dose trials. There was a modest amelioration of disturbed behavior at a moderately high dose level, but no improvement in memory or cognition was seen at any dose. At the highest dose, cognition deteriorated. These findings, in conjunction with the results of the multicenter trial described by Harbaugh, suggest that the clinical efficacy of bethanechol in AD is limited. The disappointing results of trials with varied cholinomimetic therapies suggest that more than one biochemical abnormality is responsible for the AD dementia. The neuropeptide, somatostatin, is also reduced in AD, and the level of reduction is correlated with the degree of dementia. Manipulation of this transmitter, alone or in conjunction with acetylcholine, would appear to be a next logical step in the development of an effective neurotransmitter replacement therapy for AD. Implanted drug pumps will be needed for such clinical trials. The naturally occurring somatostatin-14 is not suitable because of its short half life. Sandostatin, an analog, is chemically stable and not metabolized by brain tissue. It does not cross the blood-brain barrier so that intrathecal administration is necessary. Pharmacological research in AD is complicated by a variety of psychometric problems including the criterion-related and construct validity of the outcome measures. Patients differ in their tolerance of various therapeutic agents and in the extent of the neurochemical pathology. It is critically important, therefore, to evaluate individual, as well as group, responses to treatment. The telephone log method may provide a useful way of generating enough observations for single subject analyses without overburdening the patient with repeated testing.