Premium
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
Author(s) -
Spillmann T.
Publication year - 1983
Publication title -
annals of the new york academy of sciences
Language(s) - Uncategorized
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.712
H-Index - 248
eISSN - 1749-6632
pISSN - 0077-8923
DOI - 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1983.tb31643.x
Subject(s) - library science , citation , cochlear implant , humanities , audiology , psychology , medicine , art , computer science
Reports on results of cochlear prostheses have left open many questions. More information on implanted persons is needed to counterbalance the fact of small sample size and heterogeneous makeup of the implanted patient groups. The precise use of audiological and phonetic terms in reporting on postimplantation test results could help to clarify the influence of different electrode setups, electrode locations, and coding features, and to make results comparable between different centers.