Premium
Trend data do support the sequential nature of pinniped and sea otter declines in the North Pacific Ocean, but does it really matter?
Author(s) -
Estes J. A.,
Doak D. F.,
Springer A. M.,
Williams T. M.,
Van Vliet G. B.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
marine mammal science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.723
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1748-7692
pISSN - 0824-0469
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2009.00322.x
Subject(s) - otter , geography , pacific ocean , sea lion , oceanography , marine mammal , archaeology , physical geography , fishery , biology , geology
TheSequentialMegafaunalCollapseHypothesis(SMCH)positsthatdecimationofgreat whales in the North Pacic Ocean in the 1950s and 1960s, by Russia and Japanfollowing the end of World War II, removed an important source of prey for marinemammal eating killer whales in southwest Alaska (the Aleutian Islands, southernBering Sea, and western and central Gulf of Alaska). The killer whales subsequentlybroadened their diets to include a larger proportion of other, much smaller species—harbor seals, Steller sea lions, fur seals, and sea otters—driving them into steepdecline. In the preceding letter, Wade, Ver Hoef, and DeMaster present informationand analyses that purportedly refute the SMCH. But, as explained below, we takeexception to their analytical procedures, use of data, and the strong claims they haveemployed in their continuing attempts to discredit the hypothesis.