Premium
THE USE OF NATURAL MARKINGS IN STUDIES OF LONG‐FINNED PILOT WHALES ( GLOBICEPHALA MELAS )
Author(s) -
AugerMéthé Marie,
Whitehead Hal
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
marine mammal science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.723
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1748-7692
pISSN - 0824-0469
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-7692.2006.00090.x
Subject(s) - population , identification (biology) , cartography , statistics , geography , biology , ecology , mathematics , medicine , environmental health
Photo‐identification using natural markings has been used for pilot whale ( Globicephala melas ) studies. However, none of these studies investigated the reliability of the marks used. To identify which mark types are reliable and which could improve the method, fifteen mark types, and their distribution within the population, were described. The rates of gain and loss of each mark type were calculated and the variability in visibility was investigated. Although the mark types associated with the current photo‐identification method, the notch and the protruding piece, appear to be permanent, they allowed us to identify only 33% of our sample. The prevalence of all but two mark types is independent of the identifiability of a photograph. One of these is already used in the current photo‐identification method. This independence indicates that the proportion of the population that is currently identifiable does not differ from the rest of the population in its susceptibility to factors causing marks, such as predation, and thus appears to be representative of the whole population. Using saddle patches in combination with the current photo‐identification method would double the percentage of the identifiable individuals. However, due to limitations of matching software, the current method is easier to use.