z-logo
Premium
Divided government and US federal rulemaking
Author(s) -
Yackee Jason Webb,
Yackee Susan Webb
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
regulation and governance
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.417
H-Index - 45
eISSN - 1748-5991
pISSN - 1748-5983
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2009.01051.x
Subject(s) - rulemaking , bureaucracy , agency (philosophy) , government (linguistics) , legislature , public administration , political science , divided government , politics , regulatory agency , public economics , economics , law , sociology , social science , linguistics , philosophy
Despite paying a great deal of attention to the effects of divided government on legislative outputs, scholars of American politics have surprisingly ignored the potential impact of divided government on bureaucratic regulatory outputs. In this article we argue that divided government should reduce the volume of federal agency rulemaking. We test this hypothesis against a data set covering 21,000 rules from 1983 to 2005. Our study is one of the first to analyze the determinants of federal bureaucratic rulemaking activity across such a long period of time. Our results demonstrate that during periods of divided government, agencies issue fewer rules and fewer substantively significant rules than they do during periods of unified government. These findings suggest that divided government impedes agency rulemaking.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here