z-logo
Premium
The effect of boric acid on bacterial culture of canine and feline urine
Author(s) -
Rowlands M.,
Blackwood L.,
Mas A.,
Cripps P.,
Crompton C.,
Burrow R.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of small animal practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1748-5827
pISSN - 0022-4510
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01102.x
Subject(s) - preservative , boric acid , medicine , urine , microbiological culture , cats , urinary system , veterinary medicine , chromatography , microbiology and biotechnology , bacteria , food science , biology , chemistry , organic chemistry , genetics
O bjective : To identify the optimal method of submission of canine and feline urine for bacterial culture. M ethods : Cystocentesis samples from 250 animals (200 dogs, 50 cats) suspected of having urinary tract infections were collected. The reference aliquot, without preservative, was processed on site within 2 hours. Two further aliquots (one without preservative, one with boric acid) were stored at room temperature for up to 7 hours and then posted by guaranteed next day delivery to a commercial laboratory for analysis. R esults : Forty‐seven of the samples were positive on culture in the reference test. There was no significant difference between reference test results and those of samples posted without preservative (P=0·39), but samples posted in boric acid were significantly less likely to give a positive result (P=0·01). Samples posted without preservative had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 98%; for boric acid, sensitivity was 73% and specificity 99%. C linical S ignificance : Postal urine samples should be submitted to the laboratory in a plain sterile tube.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom