Premium
A comparison of the sedative and analgesic properties of pethidine (meperidine) and butorphanol in dogs
Author(s) -
Vettorato E.,
Bacco S.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
journal of small animal practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1748-5827
pISSN - 0022-4510
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-5827.2011.01085.x
Subject(s) - butorphanol , medicine , acepromazine , pethidine , anesthesia , sedation , propofol , sedative , analgesic , heart rate , blood pressure
O bjectives : To compare the analgesic and sedative effects of butorphanol and pethidine (meperidine) in dogs.M ethods : Twenty‐eight female dogs undergoing ovariectomy (20) or ovariohysterectomy (8) were randomly divided into two groups. Pre‐anaesthetic medication in group B consisted of 20 μg/kg intramuscular (im) acepromazine and 0·4 mg/kg butorphanol, while group P received 20 μg/kg acepromazine with 5 mg/kg pethidine. The resulting sedation (simple descriptive scale), propofol dose required to induce anaesthesia, several intraoperative cardiorespiratory variables and postoperative pain (Colorado Pain Scoring System) were compared between the two groups. A 0·2 mg/kg meloxicam dose was administered intravenously to all animals at the end of the 4 hours observation period, or earlier if the pain score was more than 13.R esults : Sedation scores, propofol induction doses and intraoperative cardiorespiratory variables were not different between groups. Postoperative pain scores were also similar although one dog in group B required rescue analgesia. Five dogs in group P vomited postoperatively.C linical S ignificance : Either butorphanol and pethidine, combined with acepromazine, produced reliable sedation and analgesia up to 4 hours after intramuscular injection in dogs.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom