z-logo
Premium
Comparison of two surgical techniques for the management of cervical spondylomyelopathy in dobermanns
Author(s) -
Rusbridge C.,
Wheeler S. J.,
Torrington A. M.,
Pead M. J.,
Carmichael S.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of small animal practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1748-5827
pISSN - 0022-4510
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1998.tb03749.x
Subject(s) - medicine , washer , surgery , decompression , lesion , mechanical engineering , engineering
A study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of two surgical techniques for the treatment of caudal cervical spondylomyelopathy (CCSM): ventral decompression (slot) and vertebral distraction and stabilisation with a screw and washer (screw/washer). Twenty‐eight dobermanns managed surgically for disc‐associated CCSM during a four‐year period were studied retrospectively. The maximum postoperative period was 40 months. Cases were excluded if a minimum follow‐up of 24 months after surgery could not be made. A ‘slot’ took a longer time to perform and had a higher rate of immediate postoperative deterioration. Duration of hospital stay was similar for both procedures. At six months after surgery the two techniques were comparable; 12/14 (screw/washer) and 13/14 (slot) patients were deemed to have a satisfactory outcome. Recurrence of cervical spinal cord disease was higher in the screw/washer dogs. At one year after surgery the recurrence rate was zero (slot) and 5/14 (screw/washer), respectively. At two years after surgery 4/14 of the slot dogs had deteriorated compared to 7/14 of the screw/washer dogs. Where Investigated, the cause of deterioration was either a domino disc lesion or vertebral endplate collapse and dorsal displacement of the screw and washer.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here