Premium
Using the Unger system to classify 386 long bone fractures in dogs
Author(s) -
Miller C. W.,
SumnerSmith G.,
Sheridan C.,
Pennock P. W.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of small animal practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1748-5827
pISSN - 0022-4510
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1998.tb03738.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ulna , fibula , tibia , femur , radiography , diaphysis , long bone , orthodontics , surgery , dentistry
A system already described by Unger and others was used to classify long bone fractures in dogs. The present paper reports experiences using the fracture classification system regarding its ease of use and the ability to analyse the data generated. Three hundred and eighty‐six canine long bone fractures were classified from radiographs. Results were assessed by reviewing the medical records or by sending questionnaires to referring veterinarians. There were a few inconsistencies, particularly in classifying proximal ulnar fractures, but the system was easy to use and data retrieval was readily accomplished. Data from the system were used to compare the results of repairs of diaphyseal fractures of the radius/ulna, femur and tibia/fibula. A chi square analysis was used to determine significant differences between the outcome scores of the three fracture types. Fractures of the femoral diaphysis had a statistically poorer outcome than did diaphyseal fractures of the radius/ulna or tibia/fibula.