Premium
Cowpox in cats
Author(s) -
Thomsett L. R.
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
journal of small animal practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1748-5827
pISSN - 0022-4510
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1989.tb01550.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cats , outbreak , cowpox virus , feline calicivirus , dermatology , serology , transmission (telecommunications) , skin biopsy , disease , cowpox , zoonosis , virus , virology , pathology , biopsy , immunology , antibody , biochemistry , chemistry , electrical engineering , engineering , vaccinia , gene , recombinant dna
Orthodox virus infection of domestic cats in the United Kingdom was first reported in 1978. Outbreaks of a disease considered to be due to cowpox (orthopox) infection had been reported in a number of species of zoo animals in Europe between 1971 and 1977 and a serious outbreak occurred among cheetahs in a United Kingdom zoo. In this species the clinical signs were ülcerating and crusted skin lesions, in some cases complicated by respiratory signs and death. An increasing number of cases of pox infection of domestic cats has been reported in Great Britain. Affected animals have shown ulcerating and crusted skin lesions particularly of the head and limbs; systemic illness was uncommon. Immunologically compromised cats, ie, FeLV positive or those receiving corticosteroid of megestrol acetate therapy, were found to be more likely to show extensive or generalised pox lesions. The source of infection is thought to be small wild mammals, ie, voles, acting as a reservoir of virus, which are preyed upon by domestic cats. Feline orthopox virus infection is a zoonosis. Transmission of the disease from affected cats to incontact owners has been reported from Great Britain and the continent of Europe. The differential diagnosis of the condition in cats includes those skin disorders commonly treated with steroidal anti‐inflammatory preparations. Definite diagnosis is important as these drugs are contraindicated in viral infections. Confirmation of diagnosis may be by virus isolation and serology. Histological examination of skin biopsy specimens is also helpful. Whether or not the causal agent of this disease should be referred to as cowpox virus or feline orthopox virus continues to be a matter of debate.