Premium
Studies of oesophageal function
Author(s) -
GREET T. R. C.,
WHITWELL KATHERINE E.
Publication year - 1987
Publication title -
journal of small animal practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1748-5827
pISSN - 0022-4510
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1987.tb01428.x
Subject(s) - medicine , distension , dysphagia , megaesophagus , radiological weapon , stomach , radiography , surgery , esophagus , radiology , gastroenterology
SUMMARY Lesions of the sympathetic nervous system have been associated with grass sickness for many years (Obel, 1955). Dysphagia is also an accepted clinical feature of subacute or chronic cases. Megaoesophagus has been reported in horses with grass sickness, but it was uncertain whether oesophageal dilation was a primary condition, or a sequel to gastric distension (Greet, 1982). Robertson and others, (1948) suggested that dysphagia was alleviated in affected horses after drainage of gastric contents. It is interesting to note that dysphagia was present in less than half the cases in this study although radiological abnormalities of the oesophagus were similar in all cases. Consistent radiological abnormalities of the oesophagus occurred in 12 out of the 14 horses examined (this consisted of incoordination or atony of the thoracic oesophagus). In the two suspected cases of grass sickness which made a clinical recovery, the radiological abnormalities were slightly different. Contrast material was transferred slowly through the cervical oesophagus and pooled at the thoracic inlet as well as at several sites in the cervical oesophagus. Eventually the contrast material passed through the distal oesophagus into the stomach. Although gastric distension was present in many of the cases examined it was not possible to identify this by radiographic means. It is unlikely that the signs of oesophageal incoordination and dilation were related only to gastric distension, as in most of the cases, contrast material pooled in the oesophagus at the thoracic inlet rather than just cranial to the diaphragm. It seems reasonable to suggest that these radiological abnormalities resulted from neurological impairment of the oesophagus. It would be of particular value to examine horses with obstructive lesions of the stomach or duodenum to evaluate the effect of upper gastro‐intestinal obstruction on oesophageal motility. A number of horses with other conditions of the upper alimentary tract have been examined radiographically at these clinics. Two horses suspected of suffering from grass sickness were found to have primary oesophageal abnormalities. One had a diverticulum and the other a localized area of dilation; both showed regurgitation of food and weight loss. Barium swallows in both horses defined the sites of their localized lesions but there was no evidence of either Type I or Type II oesophageal malfunction, and at post‐mortem examination the ganglionic changes associated with grass sickness were absent. Examination of one horse with ileocaecal intussusception did not show radiological features of the oesophagus typical of those shown by cases of grass sickness. However, contrast material passed slowly through the upper oesophagus of a foal with congenital megaoesophagus in a manner similar to the Type II oesophageal malfunction described above. It also demonstrated dilation and gross inco‐ordination of the thoracic oesophagus with pooling of contrast material at the thoracic inlet and oscillation between the thoracic inlet and diaphragm as seen in Type I malfunction in proven grass sickness. It is recognized that the radiological findings of oesophageal dilation and inco‐ordination merely demonstrate the presence of neuromuscular impairment of oesophageal movement. Until more cases of upper gastro‐intestinal disease can be examined, the specificity of these functional abnormalities for grass sickness cannot be accurately assessed. However the results assume considerable diagnostic significance when demonstrated in an adult horse which is exhibiting signs of grass sickness, particularly those of colonic impaction. The need for sophisticated equipment and thus the necessity of transport to centres so equipped, is clearly a drawback to the technique but this is often outweighed by the advantage of being able to avoid unnecessary laparotomy. As there is at present no cure for grass sickness, the improved diagnostic capability will allow severely ill horses to be destroyed without delay. It may also identify horses which on rare occasions appear to be making a slow recovery.