Premium
Are Asian Sovereign Wealth Funds Different?
Author(s) -
TRUMAN Edwin M.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
asian economic policy review
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.58
H-Index - 20
eISSN - 1748-3131
pISSN - 1832-8105
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-3131.2011.01202.x
Subject(s) - transparency (behavior) , sovereign wealth fund , accountability , global assets under management , protectionism , economics , sovereignty , financial system , business , finance , international economics , institutional investor , foreign direct investment , corporate governance , political science , macroeconomics , law , politics
Sovereign wealth funds have become a prominent feature of the international financial landscape. However, legitimate concerns have been raised about these funds. Many of those concerns can be addressed via increased accountability and transparency by the funds. The Santiago Principles are a good start in doing so. My sovereign wealth funds scoreboard points to areas where these Principles can be improved. At the same time, the OECD effort to address concerns from the host‐country side has not resulted in the erection of new barriers to that form of cross‐border investment, but the OECD failed to reverse the creeping financial protectionism of the past decade. Because of their size and the source of their funding, some Asian funds stand out. As a result, those funds will be held to a higher standard of accountability and transparency.