Premium
Electrophysiological determinants of arrhythmic susceptibility upon endocardial and epicardial pacing in guinea‐pig heart
Author(s) -
Osadchii O. E.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
acta physiologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.591
H-Index - 116
eISSN - 1748-1716
pISSN - 1748-1708
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2012.02428.x
Subject(s) - cardiology , repolarization , medicine , endocardium , proarrhythmia , electrophysiology , anesthesia , qt interval
Aim Endocardial pacing instituted to treat symptomatic bradycardia may nevertheless promote tachyarrhythmia in some pacemaker‐implanted patients. We sought to determine the contributing electrophysiological mechanisms. Methods Left ventricular ( LV ) monophasic action potential duration ( APD 90 ) and effective refractory periods were determined in perfused guinea‐pig hearts along with volume‐conducted ECG recordings during epicardial and endocardial stimulations. Results Consistent with electrotonic modulation of repolarization, APD 90 at a given (either epicardial or endocardial) recording site tended to be longer while pacing from the ipsilateral LV site as compared to stimulations applied at the opposite side of ventricular wall. As a result, the intrinsic transmural repolarization gradient was amplified during endocardial pacing while being significantly reduced upon epicardial stimulations. The maximum slope of APD 90 restitution was greater upon endocardial than epicardial pacing. The excitability was found to recur at earlier repolarization time point at endocardium than epicardium, thereby contributing to increased endocardial critical intervals for re‐excitation. Premature extrasystolic beats could have been elicited at shorter coupling stimulation intervals and propagated with greater transmural conduction delay upon endocardial than epicardial stimulations. Endocardial site exhibited lower ventricular fibrillation thresholds and greater inducibility of tachyarrhythmia upon extrasystolic stimulations as compared to epicardium. Conclusion Arrhythmic susceptibility in guinea‐pig heart is greater during endocardial than epicardial pacing because of greater transmural APD 90 dispersion, steeper electrical restitution slopes, greater critical intervals for LV re‐excitation and slower transmural conduction of the earliest premature ectopic beats. Further studies are warranted to determine whether these effects may contribute to proarrhythmia in paced human patients.