Premium
Noise Exposures of Rural Adolescents
Author(s) -
Humann Michael,
Sanderson Wayne,
Flamme Greg,
Kelly Kevin M.,
Moore Genna,
Stromquist Ann,
Merchant James A.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
the journal of rural health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.439
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1748-0361
pISSN - 0890-765X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2010.00306.x
Subject(s) - nonfarm payrolls , decibel , noise exposure , noise (video) , medicine , environmental health , exposure assessment , activities of daily living , occupational safety and health , noise pollution , environmental noise , toxicology , demography , agriculture , audiology , hearing loss , physical therapy , geography , noise reduction , sound (geography) , archaeology , pathology , geomorphology , artificial intelligence , sociology , geology , computer science , image (mathematics) , biology
Purpose: This project was conducted to characterize the noise exposure of adolescents living in rural and agricultural environments. Methods: From May to October, 25 adolescents ages 13 through 17, living either on a farm or a rural nonfarm, were enrolled in the study. Subjects received training on the correct operation and use of personal noise dosimeters and the proper way to record their daily tasks on activity cards. Subjects completed 4 days of self‐monitoring noise dosimetry, 2 days in the first round (May‐July) and 2 days in the second round (August‐October). In addition to dosimetry, subjects completed activity logs of their daily tasks. Results: The mean daily noise exposures of adolescents living on farms and in nonfarm rural homes were between 55.4 dBA (A‐weighted decibels) and 103.5 dBA, with 44% of the daily measurements greater than the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Recommended Exposure Level of 85 dBA. Task‐based analysis of noise exposures found that activities involving mechanized equipment resulted in the highest exposures, while activities in the home resulted in the lowest exposure. No particular demographic group had a statistically higher noise exposure; therefore, specific factors apart from activities and noise sources could not be identified as risk factors for exposure to hazardous noise levels. Conclusions: The results of this project indicate that rural adolescents complete a variety of activities and are exposed to noise sources with a broad range of decibel levels. While the exposures may change from day to day, there are occasions when exposure to noise exceeds the recommended levels.