Premium
Academic Degrees and Clinical Practice Characteristics: The University of Washington Physician Assistant Program: 1969‐2000
Author(s) -
Evans Timothy C.,
Wick Keren H.,
Brock Douglas M.,
Schaad Douglas C.,
Ballweg Ruth
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
the journal of rural health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.439
H-Index - 57
eISSN - 1748-0361
pISSN - 0890-765X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1748-0361.2006.00034.x
Subject(s) - graduation (instrument) , context (archaeology) , family medicine , medicine , graduate degree , odds , logistic regression , primary care , health care , degree program , nursing , gerontology , medical education , political science , paleontology , geometry , mathematics , law , biology
Context: The physician assistant profession has been moving toward requiring master’s degrees for new practitioners, but some argue this could change the face of the discipline. Purpose: To see if there is an association between physician assistants’ academic degrees and practice in primary care, in rural areas, and with the medically underserved. Methods: Surveys were sent to 880 graduates of the first 32 University of Washington physician assistant classes through 2000. Respondents noted their academic degree at program entry and the highest degree attained at any time up to the time of survey. Relationships between practice characteristics and academic degree levels were tested by unadjusted odds ratios and logistic regression after controlling for year of graduation and sex. Results: Of the 478 respondents, 54% worked in primary care, about 30% practiced in nonmetropolitan communities, and 42% reported providing care for the medically underserved. Respondents with no degree (33% of total at entry, 24% at survey) were significantly more likely than degree holders to work in primary care and nonmetropolitan areas. Respondents with no degree at program entry were significantly more likely, and those with no degree at the time of the survey were marginally more likely, to self‐report work with the medically underserved. Conclusion: Respondents with no academic degree are significantly more likely to demonstrate a commitment to primary, rural, and underserved health care. These findings may inform the national debate about the impact of required advanced degrees on the practice patterns of nonphysician providers.