z-logo
Premium
Psychopathy and Responsibility Theory
Author(s) -
Litton Paul
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
philosophy compass
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.973
H-Index - 25
ISSN - 1747-9991
DOI - 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00316.x
Subject(s) - psychopathy , wrongdoing , empathy , psychology , moral responsibility , criminal responsibility , exploit , antisocial personality disorder , social psychology , criminology , epistemology , criminal law , personality , poison control , philosophy , medicine , computer security , environmental health , injury prevention , computer science
Psychopathy presents a difficult challenge to moral and criminal responsibility theorists. Persons with the disorder have an impaired capacity for empathy and other moral emotions, and fail to feel the force of moral considerations. They have some rational impairments, but they reason adequately to manipulate, con, and exploit their victims, and otherwise to engage successfully in antisocial behavior. Is it appropriate to hold them morally responsible for their wrongdoing? Should the law hold psychopaths criminally responsible? This essay discusses philosophical debates involved in addressing these questions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here