Premium
Flow measurement with multi‐instrumentation in a tidal‐affected river
Author(s) -
Kimura N.,
Liu WenCheng,
Wu Chin H.,
Bechle Adam J.,
Chen WeiBo,
Huang WeiCher
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
water and environment journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.437
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1747-6593
pISSN - 1747-6585
DOI - 10.1111/j.1747-6593.2011.00257.x
Subject(s) - acoustic doppler current profiler , current meter , flow (mathematics) , current (fluid) , flow measurement , geology , acoustic doppler velocimetry , instrumentation (computer programming) , flow velocity , calibration , doppler effect , environmental science , hydrology (agriculture) , laser doppler velocimetry , oceanography , geotechnical engineering , mechanics , physics , medicine , blood flow , quantum mechanics , astronomy , computer science , operating system
Flow measurements in a tidal‐affected river provide important information of cyclic flow pattern characteristics in temporal and spatial variations. Reliability and accuracy of measured flow data can provide for numerical model calibration and verification. In the present study, we measured tidally affected river flow in the Danshui River of northern Taiwan during the 2008 summer and fall. The measured flow data, produced by both state of the art and conventional instruments including particle tracking velocimetry (PTV), acoustic Doppler profiler (ADP), horizontal acoustic Doppler current profiler (H‐ADCP) and Price‐type current metre (PCM) were compared and correlated during several tidal cycles. The mean flows by ADP were similar to that by PCM and highly correlated with those by PTV and H‐ADCP. Index velocity rating between ADP and H‐ADCP separately computed during the flood and ebb tides shows good correlation for the ebb tide and poor correlation for the flood tide due to subsurface maximum velocity in the middle‐ to near‐bottom layers.