Premium
The Use of Different Conveyance Calculations for Modelling Flows in a Compact Compound Channel
Author(s) -
Lyness J.F.,
Myers W. R. C.,
Wark J. B.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
water and environment journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.437
H-Index - 37
eISSN - 1747-6593
pISSN - 1747-6585
DOI - 10.1111/j.1747-6593.1997.tb00988.x
Subject(s) - overbank , channel (broadcasting) , flow (mathematics) , range (aeronautics) , open channel flow , mechanics , geology , distribution (mathematics) , floodplain , geometry , mathematics , materials science , physics , geomorphology , mathematical analysis , engineering , telecommunications , geography , cartography , facies , structural basin , composite material
Flow measurements have been taken for steady and unsteady flows on a reach of a river having a compact compound channel. The ‘single channel’, ‘divided channel’ and ‘lateral’ distribution methods have been used to calculate conveyances for use in a one‐dimensional unsteady flow model of the reach. Comparisons with measured flows show that the divided channel method and the lateral distribution method both underestimate floodplain flow depths. The lateral distribution method gives the closest accuracy in the relative depth range 0.15 ≤ Yr < 0.40. For large flow depths the single channel method becomes more accurate and slightly over‐estimates flow depths. The accuracy of unit width discharge distributions, calculated from the lateral distribution method are assessed by comparison with observed distributions for overbank flows.