Premium
Effectiveness of different chemical agents for disinfection of gutta‐percha cones
Author(s) -
Nabeshima Cleber K.,
de Lima Machado Manoel Eduardo,
Borges Britto Maria Leticia,
Pallotta Raul Capp
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
australian endodontic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.703
H-Index - 34
eISSN - 1747-4477
pISSN - 1329-1947
DOI - 10.1111/j.1747-4477.2010.00256.x
Subject(s) - sodium hypochlorite , enterococcus faecalis , gutta percha , chlorhexidine , iodine , chlorhexidine gluconate , chemistry , saline , saliva , bacterial growth , dentistry , human decontamination , immersion (mathematics) , medicine , root canal , bacteria , biochemistry , biology , anesthesia , escherichia coli , pathology , genetics , mathematics , organic chemistry , pure mathematics , gene
This aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different chemical methods to disinfect gutta‐percha cones (GP). Eighty‐six size 80 GP cones were used. The cones were contaminated by immersion in saliva and Enterococcus faecalis . Four chemical agents were used: 1% sodium hypochlorite (G1), 2% chlorhexidine gluconate (G2), 10% povidone iodine (G3) and 0.9% saline solution (G4). GP cones were immersed in the solutions for periods of 1 and 10 min. After the disinfection procedure, the cones were incubated in blood heart infusion and the presence of bacterial growth was analysed by turbidity of the medium. In G4, bacterial growth was observed in all specimens; G3 showed growth after immersion for 1 min when contaminated with E. faecalis ; G1 showed diverse results after the immersion for 1 min. Meanwhile, G1 and G3 after 10 min, and G2 at both times evaluated did not show bacterial growth. The immersion of GP cones in 2% chlorhexidine gluconate for 1 min was an effective method for GP disinfection, while 10% povidone iodine and 1% sodium hypochlorite needed 10 min of immersion to disinfect the GP.